Google: Disavowing Random Hyperlinks Flagged By Tools Is A Wild-goose Chase

Posted by

Google’s John Mueller responded to a concern about utilizing the link disavow tool and used a pointer about the very best method to utilize it, specifically discussing links flagged by tools.

Although this tool was introduced ten years ago there is still much confusion as to the appropriate use of it.

Connect Disavow Tool

The link disavow tool was introduced by Google in October 2012.

The disavow tool followed in the wake of the Penguin Algorithm from Might 2012, which ushered in a duration of unmatched mayhem in the search marketing neighborhood due to the fact that many individuals were purchasing and selling links.

This period of openly buying and selling links pulled up on Might 2012 when the Penguin algorithm upgrade was released and thousands of websites lost rankings.

Getting paid links removed was a big discomfort for due to the fact that they had to request removal from every site, one by one.

There were numerous link removal requests that some site owners began charging a cost to eliminate the links.

The SEO neighborhood asked Google for a much easier method to disavow links and in reaction to popular demand Google released the Link Disavow tool on October 2012 for the express function of disavowing spam links that a website owner was responsible for.

The idea of a link disavow tool was something that had actually been kicking around for many years, a minimum of given that 2007.

Google withstood releasing that tool up until after the Penguin upgrade.

Google’s official statement from October 2012 discussed:

“If you’ve been informed of a manual spam action based on “abnormal links” indicating your site, this tool can help you resolve the problem.

If you have not gotten this notification, this tool typically isn’t something you require to fret about.”

Google likewise offered details of what type of links might activate a manual action:

“We send you this message when we see evidence of paid links, link exchanges, or other link schemes that break our quality guidelines.”

John Mueller Guidance on Link Disavow Tool

Mueller addressed a concern about disavowing links to a domain residential or commercial property and as a side note provided suggestions on the appropriate use of the tool.

The question asked was:

“The disavow feature in Search Console is currently unavailable for domain residential or commercial properties. What are the alternatives then?”

John Mueller responded to:

“Well, if you have domain level confirmation in place, you can validate the prefix level without requiring any additional tokens.

Validate that host and do what you require to do.”

Then Mueller included an additional remark about the correct method to use the link disavow tool.

Mueller continued his answer:

“Likewise, keep in mind that disavowing random links that look odd or that some tool has actually flagged, is not a good usage of your time.

It changes nothing.

Use the disavow tool for scenarios where you really paid for links and can’t get them eliminated later on.”

Hazardous Link Tools and Random Hyperlinks

Lots of 3rd party tools use proprietary algorithms to score backlinks according to how spammy or harmful the tool company feels they are.

Those toxicity scores may precisely rank how bad specific links seem however they don’t always correlate with how Google ranks and utilizes links.

Poisonous link tool scores are simply opinions.

The tools are useful for creating an automated backlink evaluation, particularly when they highlight unfavorable links that you believed were great.

Nevertheless, the only links one should be disavowing are the links one understands are spent for or are a part of a link plan.

Should You Think Anecdotal Proof of Toxic Links?

Many individuals experience ranking losses and when inspecting their backlinks are stunned to discover a large quantity of very low quality webpages connecting to their sites.

Naturally it’s presumed that this is the factor for the ranking drops and a continuous cycle of link disavowing commences.

In those cases it might work to think about that there is some other reason for the change in rankings.

One case that stands apart is when someone came to me about a negative SEO attack. I took a look at the links and they were actually bad, precisely as described.

There were hundreds of adult themed spam relate to precise match anchor text on unrelated adult topics indicating his site.

Those backlinks fit the meaning of an unfavorable SEO attack.

I wondered so I independently contacted a Googler by email.They emailed me back the next day and validated that unfavorable SEO was not the reason why the site had lost rankings.

The real cause for the loss of rankings was that the website was affected by the Panda algorithm.

What triggered the Panda algorithm was low quality content that the site owner had produced.

I have actually seen this often times ever since, where the real problem was that the website owner was unable to objectively examine their own material so they blamed links.

It’s valuable to remember that what appears like the obvious factor for a loss in rankings is not always the actual factor, it’s simply the simplest to blame because it’s obvious.

However as John Mueller stated, disavowing links that a tool has flagged and that aren’t paid links is not an excellent use of time.


Featured image by Best SMM Panel/Asier Romero

Listen to the Google SEO Office Hours video at the 1:10 minute mark